The Complete Guide To Evolution Korea
Wiki Article
Evolution Korea
The economic crisis which swept Asia prompted a major reappraisal the traditional system of government, business alliances, as well the public management of risks. In Korea, that required a change in the development model.
In a controversial decision, the South Korean government has requested publishers of textbooks to ignore calls for the removal of examples of evolution in high school science textbooks. This includes evidence for the evolution of horses and of the Avian an ancestor Archaeopteryx.
1. Evolution and Religion
A creationist group from South Korea has successfully convinced textbook publishers to remove evidence of evolution from science textbooks for high school students. The Society for Textbook Revise, an offshoot of the Korea Association for Creation Research that aims to cleanse biology textbooks of "atheist materialism," was behind the decision. The STR claims that such materialism paints an unhopeful picture for students, and could lead to their eventual loss of faith.
Scientists around the globe expressed worry when the STR campaign made headlines. Jae Choe, evolutionary biologist at Ewha Womans University, Seoul and wrote an open letter to Nature's editor that South Korea had succumbed to religious prejudice. He was backed by colleagues around the country, who set up an organization called Evolution Korea to organize a petition to protest the changes to the textbooks.
Researchers are worried about the possibility that the STR campaign will be spread to other regions of the world where the belief in creationism is on the rise. The letter to Nature warned that the anti-evolutionist movement will intensify pressure for revisions to textbooks in other countries, notably those with strong Christian and Muslim populations.
The South Korean culture is particularly strong in the debate over evolution. 26 percent of the nation's citizens belong to one of the religious groups and the majority of them practice Christianity or Buddhism. In addition, a lot of Koreans adhere to the Ch'ondogyo philosophy, which is founded on Confucian principles which emphasizes harmony in society and individual self-cultivation. Ch'ondogyo believes that humans are one with Hanulnim, the God of the Sun, and that the heavenly blessings can be obtained through good works.
All of this has created fertile ground for the spread of creationism. Numerous studies have found that students with religious backgrounds to be more uncomfortable learning about evolution as compared to those who do not. The underlying causes of this phenomenon remain not known. Students who are religious might be less experienced with scientific theories, making them more susceptible to creationists' influence. Another factor could be that those with religious backgrounds might view evolution as a concept that is not a religion, which makes them feel less comfortable.
2. Evolution and Science
In recent times scientists have been concerned about anti-evolution efforts in schools. A survey conducted in 2009 revealed that over 40 percent of Americans believe that biological evolution is not true and that a belief in it would conflict with their convictions about religion. Despite the fact that creationism has been a huge success in some states, a lot of scientists believe that the best way to stop this trend is not to actively engage in it, but rather to educate the public about the evidence that supports evolution.
Scientists are required to educate their students about science and the theory of evolution. They must also inform the general public about the science process and how knowledge is gathered and confirmed. They must explain how scientific theories are often challenged and modified. However, misperceptions regarding the nature of scientific research frequently create anti-evolution beliefs.
For instance, some people confuse the term "theory" with the common meaning of the word - a guess or a guess. In the field of science, however, a hypothesis is rigorously tested and empirical data is used to confirm it. A theory that is able to withstand repeated testing and observations becomes a scientific concept.
The debate about evolution theory is a great opportunity to discuss both the importance of scientific method and its limitations. It is essential to be aware that science cannot provide answers to questions about life's purpose or meaning, but rather allows living things to grow and evolve.
Moreover, a well-rounded education must include exposure to all major fields of science, including evolutionary biology. This is especially important since the jobs that people have and the choices they make require understanding of how science works.
The majority of scientists across the world accept that humans have changed over time. A recent study that predicted adults' opinions of the consensus on this subject found that those who had higher levels of education and scientific knowledge were more likely to believe that there is a general consensus between scientists regarding human evolution. The people who have more religious beliefs but less knowledge of science tend to disagree more. It is essential that educators insist on the importance of knowing the consensus on this issue to ensure that people have a solid basis for making informed decisions regarding their health care, energy use and other policy issues.
3. Evolution and Culture
A close relative to the popular evolutionary theory, cultural evolution focuses on the various ways humans--and other organisms--learn from and interact with one another. Researchers in this field use explanation models and tools that are adapted from those employed by evolutionary theorists, and they reach back into human get more info prehistory to find out the genesis of our capacity for cultural understanding.
This approach also recognizes that there are differences between the characteristics of culture and biological. Cultural traits can be acquired slowly while biological traits are mostly inherited simultaneously (in sexual species, at fertilization). The acquisition of a cultural characteristic may affect the development and growth of another.
In Korea for instance the emergence of Western fashion elements in the latter half of the 19th century and early 20th century was the result of a complex series of events. One of the most important was the arrival of Japanese occupation forces who introduced Western clothing styles and hairstyles to Korean society.
After that, when Japan departed Korea in the 1930s, a few of those trends began to revert. By the end World War II, Korea was once again united, this time under the Choson dynasty rule.
Today, Korea is an economic and political power. Despite the current global financial crisis, the economy of Korea has grown consistently over the last decade and is set to sustain its steady growth in the future.
The current administration is faced with many challenges. The inability of the government to come up with a coherent strategy to tackle the current economic crisis is one the biggest challenges. The crisis has exposed shortcomings of the country's economic policies, including its excessive dependence on exports and foreign investment which might not be sustainable over the long term.
As the crisis has shattered the confidence of investors, the government needs to reconsider its economic strategy and come up with alternatives to boost domestic demand. It also needs to overhaul the incentive, monitoring, and disciplining systems that are in place to guarantee a stable financial environment. This chapter outlines several scenarios of how the Korean economy might develop in the post-crisis period.
4. Evolution and Education
A fundamental challenge for evolution educators is how to teach evolutionary concepts in a way that is suitable for students of various ages and developmental stages. For example, teachers must be aware of the diversity of religions in their classrooms and create a setting where students with religious and secular beliefs are comfortable with learning about evolution. Teachers should also be able to identify common misconceptions about evolution and know how to correct them in the classroom. Additionally, teachers should be able to access a range of resources available for teaching evolution and be able locate them quickly.
In this regard, the Thinking Evolutionarily Convocation had a key role in bringing together evolutionary researchers and educators from various sectors to discuss the best methods for teaching about Evolution. The participants included representatives from scientific societies, educational researchers, government funding agency officials as well as curriculum developers. The convergence of these diverse parties resulted in a consensus set of recommendations that will form the basis for future action.
It is crucial to include evolution in all science curricula at every level. To achieve this goal, the National Science Education Standards (NRC) require that evolution be taught in an integrated manner across all life sciences using a sequence of concepts that are developmental appropriate. Additionally, a new publication from the NRC provides guidance to schools on how they can integrate evolution into the science curriculum.
Multiple studies have proven that a more comprehensive presentation of evolution leads to greater student understanding and belief in evolution. It is difficult to determine the causality of teaching in the classroom because the curriculum for schools do not change in a random manner and are affected by the timing of state board of education and the gubernatorial election. To overcome this limitation, I use a longitudinal data set that allows me to account for fixed state and year effects and the individual-level variation in teacher beliefs about the evolution of their curriculum.
Teachers who are more comfortable teaching evolution also have less internal barriers. This is in line with the hypothesis that faculty who are more confident are less likely to avoid teaching about evolution in the classroom. They may also be more likely to employ strategies such as the reconciliatory method which is used to increase the acceptance of undergraduate students of evolution.